First Impressions: Hulu
Hulu, the long-awaited "answer to YouTube" co-venture between News Corp and NBC, launched in private beta this week. You can get a full rundown of Hulu's features from any number of sites. Here, I'd like to draw out the most powerful characteristics of the site:
Hulu vs YouTube
Comparing these two sites is a nuanced proposition. On the surface, they have little in common. Both allow you to view and share videos. But while YouTube offers user uploads, comments, and social networking features, Hulu is almost entirely presentational. Despite Silicon Valley's insistence that social networking features are tantamount to success, I would argue that 80% of consumers simply want to watch free video without comments or clutter. Hulu gives them that, and does it much better than any of the individual network sites. In fact, it does it better than YouTube. The basic competive landscape between then two sites is simple (see graphic below).
The real comparison between Hulu and YouTube is on the business level, i.e., will Hulu be a more profitable advertising machine for the networks than YouTube? I'm willing to bet the answer is yes, but only marginally. What Hulu really does is give the networks self-sufficiency in the online marketplace, thereby freeing them to be more aggressive in negotiations with YouTube, both in and out of the courtroom.
The Good Stuff for Consumers
- Custom Embeds. Can't stress how important this is. The very fact that you can embed videos opens Hulu to a wide audience. Even better: You can custom-cut a section from a video to create your own clip (kinda like vidshare site Motionbox). What this does is empower the audience in a way previously accessible only to dedicated video editors. It will create discussions around single moments -- like, say, Miss South Carolina stumbling through an answer, or Jan saying something particularly funny on The Office.
- Timeline Jumping. Extremely easy to jump to different parts of a video without the inconvenience of buffering.
- Multiple channels/shows. Good out of the box selection: Fox, NBC, FX, SciFi, Bravo, E!, Fuel, USA, others.
- Ease of use. A very simple, uncluttered interface that makes browsing and searching for titles easy. This is very important, because basically the networks are competing for the attention of consumers who want something for free. As one of those consumers, I have several choices: Bittorrent, YouTube, a variety of video-sharing sites, download on iTunes, Amazon UnBox, etc. Among those Hulu, hands down, offers the best combination of price and quality.
The Bad Stuff for Consumers
- Time limits. You can only view the last five shows from a currently running TV program. Probably done to protect syndication revenue and DVD sales. Understandable, but not good enough. Hulu's forcing consumers into a course of action, the options of which include downloading illegally. Why not make it easy to download legally for a price?
- Few movies. Only ten or so. Although they do have Conan the Librarian.
- A few anemic features. Especially the "details" option on the player, which offers very little information, just like the "info" button on most cable boxes. Why not provide links to Wikipedia, or an in-house store of information about the video?
And now: Conan.

There isn't much of a story so far to interact with. The season opens with a short introduction to the girls, who prance around their house in booty shorts and lingerie. There's a tiny dog. The girls fart on each other. That's episode one. Episode two's a girl's-night-in party which ends, apparently, with one of the girls (Heather) going out afterwards and hooking up. We find that out in episode three, in which the girls talk in the kitchen. Episode four: The girls watch TV. Episode five: The girls play in the hot tub. If you suspect I'm not doing the story justice, simple say "peace out, bitches" five times and you've reiterated the entirety of the dialogue.
Steve Bryant has been covering online media for five years. He lives in New York. 

