By Andrew Wallenstein
Maybe I ask too much of Madison Avenue, but I went into this Super Bowl expecting to see new creative heights being hit by this year's ads. After all, with viewers now trained to expect the advertising experience to continue online, surely marketers understood that the big game was just the first window in which their spots would be seen; and if you don't believe me, ask
Comscore.
So I figured we'd see ads this year that really took into account the potential for viral afterlife. Something that made you just have to go online for repeat viewing or to pass along to a friend. But, no, it was the same collection of instantly forgettable mind mush...nothing funny or visually memorable enough to merit online viewing. It would stand to reason that considering it cost $2.7 million to get 30 seconds of airtime, a marketer might want to cobble together something that could live on just a little longer.
If by chance you missed the big game, AOL Sports has a nifty area where you can see all the ads you missed. Not that you missed much.
Steve's .02: I would add that the frequency and success of
online vids makes the Super Bowl's own vaunted snack-size ads less
compelling.
Stats about the game's effects on online traffic are mixed. Akamai reports that Super Bowl advertisers' web sites saw no dramatic increase in traffic,
as opposed to years previous. Meanwhile, according to Google Trends,
the most popular search for Super Bowl ads, "Super bowl commercials",
comes in at an anemic rank of 21 for Monday, the day after the game. (Best search of all time: "How old is Tom Petty", coming in at #27).
Neither of these stats, though surely disappointing to advertisers,
are conclusive. For all I know, the advertised products are racking up
sales and putting up townhouses in the real estate they've bought in
our minds. But anecdotally, I can say I haven't had a single
conversation about superbowl commercials with my friends. No one in my
office has forwarded a link to an ad. That's a change from years
previous. Nobody seems to be talking about the ads this go around
(except the Doritos mouse enraged to the point of fisticuffs, which
ruzocked).
Back in the day, Super Bowl commercials were events. Kinda like FDR's
fireside chats. And they showed the best and brightest ideas. But now
the best and brightest ideas are online, and they're shown at such a
great frequency, that it's possible we've become too accustomed to
bite-sized entertainment to care. Every day is Super Bowl commercial day
when you're online.
BTW. Budweiser. Next year, if you do yet another Clydesdale ad, may
I suggest instead of hairy-ankled equines you substitute women in Uggs.
Just sayin, ladies. Your shoes are fugly.